I'm surprised at the amount of misinformation mixed into this thread.
Dongya supply professional and honest service.
First off, whether or not the rings get filed, gaps can and must be checked.
The comment about 75mm rings being too big for the bore is just plain garbage. They would need ~1/16" filed off the end, and that's fine. If they were an inch too big, different story, but we're talking .020 in bore size here.
There have only ever been two reasons to run chrome rings. One is in Porsche motors with Alusil or Nikasil bore treatments (both very hard). The other is for off-road motors that see a lot of airborne particulates (dust). In both cases, the goal is to keep the top rings from wearing out quickly by using a very hard chrome plating on the face of the ring. The rings are not made of chrome, they're still iron, and have no performance benefit besides the face hardness. Chrome rings do take a long time to seat, and may never seat with improper breakin. Also require different bore finish.
I'd just plan on the plain rings and check gaps. If the last set didn't cause a problem, that says they're fine.
Nockenwelle said:I'm surprised at the amount of misinformation mixed into this thread.
First off, whether or not the rings get filed, gaps can and must be checked.
The comment about 75mm rings being too big for the bore is just plain garbage. They would need ~1/16" filed off the end, and that's fine. If they were an inch too big, different story, but we're talking .020 in bore size here.
There have only ever been two reasons to run chrome rings. One is in Porsche motors with Alusil or Nikasil bore treatments (both very hard). The other is for off-road motors that see a lot of airborne particulates (dust). In both cases, the goal is to keep the top rings from wearing out quickly by using a very hard chrome plating on the face of the ring. The rings are not made of chrome, they're still iron, and have no performance benefit besides the face hardness. Chrome rings do take a long time to seat, and may never seat with improper breakin. Also require different bore finish.
I'd just plan on the plain rings and check gaps. If the last set didn't cause a problem, that says they're fine.
The problem with running rings that are 0.020" oversize for the bore isn't the end gap. As you and others have pointed out it's pretty trivial to set the end gap. The problem is that rings are manufactured so that they're round and have a specific tension when installed in a specific bore size. When installed in a different bore size they're going to be less round and the tension will be effected. Twenty plus years ago some ring manufactures specified a tolerance of up to + 0.010" for a given ring size but I've never seen a minus tolerance. Here's a chart from a Hastings catalog.
Want more information on Custom Piston Ring? Feel free to contact us.
HOW TO SELECT CORRECT OVERSIZE RINGS
Hastings Piston Rings are available in Std. size and the following oversizes:
.020", .030", .040", .060", .080", .100", .120" where required.
Contact Hastings Piston Ring Engineering Department at factory for non-cataloged ring applications, or unusual
oversizes. For sets in stock the following chart can be used.
The chart below gives the proper oversize rings to install for various oversize cylinders.
BORE DIAMETER USE RING SIZE
Std. to .010" ................................................STD
.020" to .029" .............................................. .020"
.030" to .039" .............................................. .030"
.040" to .049" .............................................. .040"
.060" to .069" .............................................. .060"
.080" to .089" .............................................. .080"
.100" to .109" .............................................. .100"
.120" to .129" .............................................. .120"
So, what happens if you use an oversize ring in a smaller bore? The ring tension will be higher than spec and they won't seal correctly. How bad will it be? I don't really know. I'm sure the engine would run and maybe it would be OK for a street motor where you had no other choice but it's clearly not the correct way to do it and since we're talking about a race motor why would you do that?
As to ring types, you're correct. We're talking coatings not ring material. A plain cast ring is not a bad choice in this application and I should have said that in my earlier posts. My excuse is that I was typing on my and I was going to clarify my recommendation if or when Tom came back with some piston specs.
I typically use moly coated rings in vintage race motors when they're legal but it depends on the exact application including what part of the country their running in. Here in the southwest where we're often racing in very dusty conditions and chrome rings may be appropriate.
Tom said:In reply to APEowner :
The 74.5mm pistons have 2mm first and second groove and a 4mm oil groove.
It took 4 months for a set to pop up. Toyota 4K engines use the same rings. Mitsubishi 4G36 is the same as well but finding those is even harder.
Most rings available for that bore size are to thin; motorcycles use 1mm. Honda & Toyota engines are typically 1.5mm thick.
Yeah, that's an unusual configuration. I'm not seeing anything in the catalogs I have. My next step would be to reach out to Total Seal and see if they have a standard part that would fit. They can make anything you want but for your application if you're doing custom it would make more sense to spring for custom pistons with a more standard ring size.
I'm happy to reach out to Total Seal for you but if you want to just do it yourself here's the link Total Seal - Find a ring. They'll need the grove depths in addition to the information you've provided already.
Contact us to discuss your requirements of Piston Ring Material. Our experienced sales team can help you identify the options that best suit your needs.