Intercity Electric Buses Review | Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra

Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Why the urge to try an E-Bus and how I got the opportunity?

My travel across the country, especially South and West India, has gone up exponentially in the last two years or so - and I use all modes of transport in the process. On one trip, I found that Nuego was operating a service from Trichy to Bengaluru and hence decided to see what this E-Bus experience was all about. Just about then, I found fellow bhpian DigitalOne's review of Nuego (NueGo Electric Bus Service Review | Bengaluru to Chennai) and decided to try it out. @DigitalOne had forewarned of a possible long charging stop, but I decided to try the service out nevertheless. Opportunities to try alternate modes of travel should be explored without procrastinating. Who knows when one would get the next chance!

Booking Experience

Nuego's website is straightforward, but the fares aren't . They fluctuate wildly and it is left to one's smartness to book one's ticket and the right price point. The fares are weird

a. first row is, say, INR 450 (sitting ducks?)
b. rows 2,3,4 approx. INR 550
c. rows 5,6,7 approx. INR 520
d. rows 8,9,10 approx. INR 400

The lowest fare would remain steady till departure of the bus but the others would go up or down wildly based on, say, number of hits or rate at which seats are being gobbled up. I found my seat being offered for a high of 620 and a low of 450, for a bus in which only approx 15 seats were booked.

GST Levy

I have travelled airconditioned buses aplenty and have always paid 5% GST, but Nuego is the only service where I've been charged 12%. Why? Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 17:57. Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra D-Day and the ride

I reached the point of origin and found the bus without fuss. However, for first timers, there is likely to be some confusion resulting in calls to the crew. Instead of vaguely mentioning the boarding point as near X Hotel, they should clearly mention it as opp. X hotel, outside the SETC Bus Stand etc. Anyways, on a hot afternoon, the bus was extremely cool even with the aircon off, and when the motor was started for the AC, there was barely any noise.

Departure was on time, and in a short while, we'd exited the city onto the road to Salem. Ride quality was brilliant, aircon was tops, and the ottoman seats made by Harita were quite impressive. The talking point about these seats is the overall leatherette finish and the steep recline angle.

Cockpit- the polycarbonate on the instrument cluster is already bearing the brunt of UV radiation


View of the road from inside




Seats


Seat Recline - am sure this superior recline angle with the ottoman would translate into a blissful sleeping experience during night journeys


A small bottle of water is given to every passenger - more available later if needed
Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 18:00. Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Likes

1. Superior Acceleration
2. Almost silent ride except for some minor road noise
3. Excellent Ride quality
4. Powerful Airconditioning
5. Crew demeanour - one used to work for another big bus operator and the other gentleman used to be a trucker

Dislikes

1. Ultra long charging stop
2. Too many nuisance audio alarms - pedestrian warning, unsafe following distance, driver distraction, lane departure warning, collision warning rendering them equivalent to "Cry Wolf"

All went well till the rest stop

It was a fantastic journey till the rest-cum-charging stop. The ride to Salem was done in less than 3 hours, and we were in Aasai Aasai Ananda Bhavan Delight at Omalur bypass in about 3hrs 25mins. Fantastic ride this far, and we were then given the first shocker - stop for charging and meals would be 1 hour . Since I had a lot of time on hand, I went next door to this place which is a quaint eatery, had 2 dal vadas and a cup of black coffee, all for a mere 22 bucks, and waited for the charging to get over. The charging stop finally came to an end in 1hr 15mins which, in my view, is unacceptable time. There was some power outage which resulted in charging getting interrupted. If uninterrupted power supply cannot be assured, electric bus patronage would gradually slip away!

Safety at the charging stop

1. Rubber mats placed at the charger
2. Fire extinguishers available and visible
3. Attendant was putting on a reflective jacket and was in safety shoes

DOs and DONTs board displayed, but nobody heeded them; I found folks gathered at the charging point when the charging was taking too long; this should be curtailed. I had an urge to go and check the charging station, but stayed away as I'd be treated as a trespasser. Also, I'd opine that passengers should be off the bus during charging stops for safety reasons.


The refreshment-cum-charging point


Parked at the charging station with the twin charger plugged in


Charging station




Views of the coach






Excellent warm white lighting in the bus


The following video was captured on the difficult uphill ride at the Thoppur ghat - this should give an idea of how effortlessly the bus pulled despite not being pushed too hard. Those nuisance warnings are also audible in the clip.


Despite an 8hr 30mins ride (including the long 1hr 15min rest cum charging stop and an approx 20min delay due to traffic congestion before the E-City toll), I arrived at my destination fresh, and the crew was considerate to drop passengers off on the left side of the road at Silk Board. Other buses would drop people off at the foot of the bridge and then they'd have to cross dangerously via incoming traffic onto the service road. I loved the crew, their driving skills, demeanour, and the overall ride. Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 18:09. Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Ride#2 - KSRTC EV PowerPlus

This opportunity came just two days thereafter when I had to travel on work. Rather than call a company car to travel 350km, pick me up and again take me there, I decided to do half the distance to Chitradurga by a KSRTC Volvo/EV, and have the company car pick me up from Chitradurga. Here came an opportunity to ride the KSRTC EV Power Plus. Fresh from the journey by the Nuego, I looked forward to some interesting comparisons.

The cockpit


View of the front from inside




Seats - no Ottoman


Seat recline


Cabin view


Views of the coach - looks stunning






View from inside while riding the bus - note the rear camera always on




After my ride, I also got to read fellow bhpian dailydriver's experience on a KSRTC EV PowerPlus (Intercity Bus travel reviews) Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 18:11. Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Having now experienced two EVs, here are some comparisons - Nuego E-Bus vs KSRTC EV Power Plus - both were early manufactured

• Nuego - Mytrah Mobility MY12ACX4
• KSRTC EV Power Plus - Olectra Greentech EBuzz C9

Non-pictorial comparisons

1. Warning signals - too many nuisance warnings on the Mytrah eg. pedestrian warning, unsafe following distance, driver distraction, lane departure warning, collision warning; none on the Olectra
2. Acceleration - Mytrah 10/10 vs Olectra 10/10
3. Ride quality - Mytrah 9/10 vs Olectra 6/10 (too much of up and down movements on the Olectra)
4. Airconditioning - Mytrah 10/10 vs Olectra 9/10
5. Road noise - Mytrah 9/10 vs Olectra 7/10
6. Crew uniform - KSRTC's crew are probably as well turned out as some pilots
7. Crew demeanour - very courteous on both services

Pictorial Comparison - Nuego first and KSRTC EV next

1. Name plates - the Mytrah name plate had enough details professioannly punched while KSRTC Olectra name plate markings were like how we'd mark names on vessels; also didn't have details on Ah and KW




2. Console View - the Olectra console was better readable with a better angle but the dashboard seemed more worn out




adding to the mix is the cockpit in an Eicher


3. View of the front from inside - both offered a nice view




4. Tyres - the Nuego clearly had better tyres - Michelin which caused almost zero noise against the KSRTC's CEAT Winenergy which were mighty noisy. Both were Volvo B11R sized 295/80R22.5




5. Cabin views - both were pleasing with similar coloured seats and curtains




6. Seats - here Nuego's were way better




7. Seat recline - Nuego was better




8. Exterior looks - KSRTC was the better looking of the two


Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 18:17. Distinguished - BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: NSEW Posts: 4,068 Thanked: 30,888 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review |Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Another ride by a KSRTC Airavat Club Class to compare, contrast

Having ridden in these two EVs, I rode an Airavat Club Class Volvo B9R just to feel the difference, and it was clearly evident that the EV Power Plus was no match for the Airavat, in terms of ride or in terms of top speed.

Summing it up

If the head honchos at Greencell Mobility are seeing this post, I'd request them to act on the following:

1. quicken charging stops and make them no longer than 45 mins else they'd lose the plot
2. it might make sense to have a charged bus ready at the station, transfer folks from the arriving bus to the ready to move bus, and charge the arriving bus to be ready to pick up passengers from the next bus. This way, wait times at charging stops can be eliminated
2. fix bugs in the reservation system - bookings from Nuego and other aggregators are allowed even at departure time of the bus and as a result, their names don't appear on the charts and they get left behind; I saw two such cases - one at Trichy and one at Salem bypass

What I also foresee is the batteries losing State of Charge faster as time goes by and this might result in unforeseen breakdowns enroute, and that might be the last nail! Until passengers' concerns and pains around E-buses are addressed, for an average passenger like me, I'll still go the IC engine way unless, of course, it is a short 250km ride. Signing off with some pics from my recent ride in a 11 year old fantastically maintained Volvo B9R.

At the designated stop Shree Rathnam Dobbaspet


Enroute Dobbaspet to Sira


My experience with all KSRTC crew thus far - all smiles!
Last edited by vigsom : 30th May at 16:18. BHPian  
Join Date: Feb Location: Chennai Posts: 476 Thanked: 2,454 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review | Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra Thanks for sharing this.

The Omalur stop where you stopped for a charging break is where we stop to charge our car as well when we travel from Bangalore to Coimbatore on the ABB charger in front of the restaurant.

Hardly a year ago this restaurant used to see very less patronage, this charging stop for buses have completely changed the fortunes of this place. High quality restaurants with good infrastructure are going to be major beneficiaries of this electric transition in my opinion.

It's very safe to stay inside the car/bus while it charges because the passenger has no contact with the ground. In fact when the bus is moving as well it charges using regenerative breaking. In the ZS EV, I have seen regeneration producing up to 60 kW of energy while slowing down from high speeds equivalent to a DC fast charger.

I wish these companies continue to run the air con and let the passengers sit inside the bus while it is being charged. It's a major passenger experience turn off otherwise. BHPian  
Join Date: Aug Location: Dehradun Posts: 200 Thanked: 704 Times Re: Intercity Electric Buses Review | Nuego Mytrah vs KSRTC Olectra I had an awful experience! I’ve done two trips on the Neugo electric bus, Dehradun-Delhi and back. The bus wasn’t particularly clean, the horn noise was too audible inside, and on the Delhi-Dehradun run it is unable to complete the journey in one charge, apparently because in Delhi they have multiple pick up points and have to keep the AC on while standing and waiting. The worst thing was that their bespoke charging station at the midway point hadn’t been working for a while when we reached, because of a power cut. There was no fuel for the generator. And there were three buses in the charging queue before us. We finally got charged and moving after an hour and a half. This stop has two public chargers but they didn’t use those either. Disappointing really, because otherwise these electric buses run smoothly and well. Last edited by Vikram : 31st May at 16:16. Reason: Typo

Public transit, school, and intercity buses are primarily powered by internal combustion engines using diesel or renewable biobased diesel fuels. Alternative fuels and technologies are becoming available in the form of battery electric technology and hydrogen fueled options.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website tenglong.

Public transportation is a valuable asset to every community around the country and the nation as a whole, enabling personal mobility and supporting economic prosperity. The principal mission of public transportation agencies is to provide efficient mobility services for its constituents, foregoing the need for personal vehicle trips that contribute substantially to traffic congestion and urban air pollution.

In addition to regular route services, assets of public transportation agencies are often mobilized as part of disaster response plans, such as transit buses enabling evacuation of impacted areas and serving as temporary shelters or cooling centers.

Diesel is the predominant technology powering public transit, school, and intercity bus services nationwide because of its safety, reliability, efficiency, durability, low-cost of ownership and operations, and now near-zero emissions.

According to the American Public Transportation Association (APTA), in , diesel and biodiesel were the predominant fuel sources for transit buses, followed by natural gas and hybrid diesel electric.

The latest data shows that as of December , 77% of all transit buses in operation were powered by a diesel engine. Of those, 55% are of the latest generation of advanced diesel technology that achieves near zero emissions; 98% fewer particulate emissions and 98% fewer emissions of nitrogen oxides, compared to previous generation buses.

Advanced technology diesel was first introduced in transit buses in . It has been the standard for all new buses since that time. Achieving near zero emissions is enabled by new particulate filters and selective catalytic reduction technology that reduces nitrogen oxides to other compounds.

Advanced diesel technology buses are about 20%-25% less expensive than compressed natural gas (CNG) buses, and two or three times less expensive than all-electric models. Advanced diesel technology buses do not require new and separate fueling, or recharging, infrastructure required for electric or hydrogen options.

Replacing older buses with new advanced diesel technology buses can help transit agencies achieve greater emission reductions for the communities they serve, while providing reliable and low-cost transit needs. And when coupled with using renewable low carbon biodiesel fuels, transit fleets can rapidly take steps to decarbonizing their operations while maintaining fare levels and service at the lowest cost. Recent studies found that in a 10 year period in 10 northeastern states, accelerating turnover of the existing fleet to new generation diesel and using advanced renewable biodiesel fuels reduced three times more greenhouse gas emissions at 25% of the cost of an all electric approach.

Decarbonization Strategies for Public Transit

To reduce carbon emissions from public transportation, local and regional governments have a growing range of options available, including switching to low-carbon renewable biofuels, use of hybrid electric technology or battery electric vehicles. The Federal Transit Administration through their low or no emission vehicle program – (c) has a number of incentive and cost-sharing programs to aide communities.

The company is the world’s best Electric Intercity Buses supplier. We are your one-stop shop for all needs. Our staff are highly-specialized and will help you find the product you need.

When comparing fuel and technology choices, transit fleets must consider a myriad of options that best serve their individual needs. There are various tradeoffs with all fuels and technologies, and transit agencies are best equipped to determine which fuels and technologies can best serve their communities and the mission of their transit agencies.

In addition to the driving range advantages of diesel over other fuels, diesel provides maximum flexibility for changing routes, service runs and expansions into new communities without limitation of cost of installation or availability of fueling network or access to parts and servicing. For example, electric transit buses operating in climate extreme areas (hot or cold) often experience reduction in driving range or load carrying capacity due to energy being diverted to power heaters or air conditioning systems. In some instances, this could require rerouting of buses or the use of reliever buses to fill in the gaps to sustain service uptime commitments.  

Because most all transit buses are purchased with assistance from the Federal Transit Administration, they are expected to be in service for 22 years. With limited funding and desire not to raise fares or curtail services, often a community will get more clean air for the dollar and more newer buses in the fleet by investing in the newest generation of advanced diesel technology rather than more expensive alternative fuel options.

Diesel-Hybrid Electric Technology

It was introduced into transit buses in the mid-’s and has been refined continually since. These dual system buses enable the use of a downsized diesel engine combined with the benefits of parallel, or serial, hybrid systems that capture and store energy from braking and utilize that to reduce the load on the diesel engine. This reduces fuel consumption, greenhouse gas emissions, and brake wear—a major cost for transit agencies.

The use of advanced renewable biobased diesel fuels is an increasingly successful sustainability and decarbonization strategy for transit fleets. All diesel engines —in new and existing transit buses can —use biodiesel blends of up to B20. Use of these fuels is possible across the entire vehicle fleet without requiring new vehicles or infrastructure to achieve benefits.

Advanced diesel technology buses today compete with battery electric, hydrogen fuel cell and natural gas technologies. The primary basis for introducing the new fuels is decarbonization of the transportation sector to achieve greenhouse gas reduction and broader climate goals.

Battery electric bus options are increasingly available and their adoption, as well as the essential refueling infrastructure, is supported by a number of incentive programs from the Inflation Reduction Act.  

In consideration of the merits of battery electric buses, transit agencies must consider that over half of all electricity generated in the US comes from fossil fuels (natural gas, coal). While the bus has no tailpipe emissions, in most states there are significant emissions generated from burning fossil fuels at the electric power plant. Each state’s electricity generation profile is different. While the electric power sector and US has a goal of net zero power generation by , progress toward this goal is slower than expected.

Other important considerations include the suitability of the diesel alternatives to the routing and passenger load characteristics of the system.  Recharge times for buses, range of operation, impacts of extreme heat or cold weather conditions can all impact the real-world performance of battery electric buses. 

Hydrogen fuel cell buses are another option for decarbonization available to transit districts, Though less developed than battery electric options, these require hydrogen for fueling, but have more diesel-like performance in terms of driving range and performance.

If you want to learn more, please visit our website urban city-bus.